Helping a mindful productivity SaaS find product–market fit

In 2022, mindful productivity startup Beams asked me to investigate why their early ‘Focus Mode’ feature failed to gain traction with beta users. My work revealed user needs that weren’t being articulated, reframed their initial approach, and equipped the team with a clearer, more differentiated path to product–market fit.

Company
Beams
Role
Product Designer
Date
Feb-October 2022
Sector
Productivity, Future of Work

Background

The mindful productivity startup

Beams was a pre-seed productivity startup with a mission to “improve focus and reduce distraction”. Their early product combined a calendar with lightweight meeting tools and a Focus Mode designed to help knowledge workers carve out distraction-free time.

Focus Mode underperforms

Built on early research suggesting customers valued reducing distractions and working single-mindedly, Focus Mode struggled to gain traction in practice, with only a small fraction of users trying it more than once — leaving the team searching for clarity on why.

Beams' beta product

Select Focus Mode

Work

Configure duration, intention

Beams' beta product

8%

Users who completed more than one Focus

Beta test result

Improve Focus and reduce context switching

Beams' mission

Beta product “Focus Mode” user flow

Understanding the problem

Diagnosing why Focus Mode underperformed

I analysed Focus Mode using Nir Eyal’s Indistractable model — a framework that outlines 4 complementary strategies for managing distraction. Through this lens, it was clear that Beams’ product addressed only a narrow slice of the focus problem: it subdued some external triggers but overlooked the deeper internal drivers and barriers to focus. In parallel, a hands-on review of the experience revealed conceptual flaws and UX limitations that reduced its practical value. My hypothesis? Users weren’t rejecting the idea of Focus Mode, but rather its narrow scope and limited execution.

Indistractable strategy

What it means

Focus Mode implementation?

Master Internal Triggers

Manage emotions

❌ Not yet

Make Time for Traction

Schedule priorities

⚠️  Partially with intention setting, but no ability to plan

Hack Back External Triggers

Control your environment

✅ Yes: Slack Do Not Disturb integration

Prevent Distraction with Pacts

Attach costs to distraction

❌ Not yet

Mapping competitors validated the model 's relevence

While we love to blame external triggers, the fact of the matter is most of our distractions begin from within.

Nir Eyal, Indistractable

Indistractable strategy

What it means

Focus Mode implementation?

Master Internal Triggers

Manage emotions

❌ Not yet

Make Time for Traction

Schedule priorities

⚠️  Partially with intention setting, but no ability to plan

Hack Back External Triggers

Control your environment

✅ Yes: Slack Do Not Disturb integration

Prevent Distraction with Pacts

Attach costs to distraction

❌ Not yet

Mapping competitors validated the model 's relevence

While we love to blame external triggers, the fact of the matter is most of our distractions begin from within.

Nir Eyal, Indistractable

Overview of results

  • Accountability stood out as the most innovative and high-value opportunity.
  • Environmental Controls divided testers: some swore by blockers, while others preferred lighter-touch nudges (e.g. visual emphasis).
  • Coaching tools were perceived as less valuable - a "nice to have".

Key insight

Beyond the feature feedback, a critical insight emerged: users appeared to recognise that their biggest barrier wasn’t just external distraction, but their own difficulty staying accountable and following through — something not captured in Beams’ earlier research.

Concept testing

Exploring new focus solutions with users

To test my hypothesis, I designed a concept testing exercise to evaluate the viability of new focus solutions and expand Beams’ understanding of user needs. I facilitated a team ideation session in which we generated feature ideas across three categories - Accountability , Environmental Controls and Coaching. From this, I created mockups for six concepts and tested them with users, evaluating each by perceived value, stress potential, and novelty.

6 focus-concept mockups

Targeted Blocker

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS

Access to apps and websites that are not on-task are blocked when in focus.

Focus Prompts

ACCOUNTABILITY

Beams informs you when you reach a distraction threshold.

Visual Emphasis

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS

Apps and websites that are not helpful to your task are dimmed or desaturated.

Progress Reports

COACHING

Analytics show how you've spent your focus time and offer goals and tips.

Live Focus Monitor

ACCOUNTABILITY

A menu bar widget shows you how closely your behaviour matches your intended task.

Feature-by-feature evaluation

User stories that emerged from testing

Reimagining Focus Mode

Placing accountability at the core of the experience

The findings revealed a broader opportunity for Beams: moving beyond muting distractions to helping people commit to what matters and follow through. To bring this vision to life and show the team what it could look like in practice, I created a proof-of-concept blueprint for a reimagined Focus Mode.

  • Reflected multiple focus strategies into one end-to-end experience.
  • Put accountability at the core — a user-validated need and a distinctive opportunity in the market.
  • Appeared technically feasible, since time-boxed tasks gave the system clear data points to evaluate distraction and deliver prompts.

End-to-End Focus

End-to-End Focus Blueprint

Unlike the original Focus Mode, which was  limited in scope and execution, the reimagined version:

  • Reflected multiple focus strategies in one end-to-end experience
  • Put accountability at the core — a user-validated need and a distinctive market opportunity
  • Was flexible enough to adapt to different workstyles and preferences

Proposed next steps

To de-risk the concept before major investment, I recommended a staged path to validate both usability and feasibility:

  1. Simulate focus prompts manually to test whether they support focus or create stress.
  2. Build a narrow prototype focused on a single, simple task to test technical feasibility.
  3. Expand iteratively into more complex tasks if the core concept proved viable.

Project takeaways

This project reinforced the value of stepping back and using the right frameworks at the right time. Behavioural analysis gave me a quick way to diagnose why Focus Mode was underperforming, while showing users concrete solution ideas helped surface needs they wouldn’t normally voice. Turning those insights into a sharper value proposition and an end-to-end blueprint gave the team clarity on where to go next.

Key learnings

  • Reflected multiple focus strategies into one end-to-end experience.
  • Put accountability at the core — a user-validated need and a distinctive opportunity in the market.
  • Appeared technically feasible, since time-boxed tasks gave the system clear data points to evaluate distraction and deliver prompts.
  • Behavioural and UX frameworks can deliver fast, actionable insights
  • Testing with solution concepts (not just pain points) can reduce bias and reveal hidden needs
  • Using clear, unambiguous language (e.g. around “distraction” or “context switching”) created alignment within the team and clarity in user testing